In the 2012 article, “Gartner
Survey Shows Why Projects Fail” Analyst, Lars Mieritz, classified IT projects
by size and revealed the reasons behind project failures.
The three
classifications:
1. Small
2. Medium
3. Large
The six causes
behind IT application project failure:
1. Functionality
issues
2. Substantially
late
3. Quality
issues
4. High
cost variance
5. Cancelled
after launch
6. Rejected
or not implemented for other reasons
Small:
A small project was
defined as one with a budget of less than $350,000. These sized projects are
easier to maintain, oversee and execute. In order to achieve a lower failure
rate, it is essential that projects remain small and do not exceed 6 months in
duration. A fascinating pattern emerged when comparing the most recent survey
results with previous data gathered. It indicated that small IT projects
encounter a one-third lower failure rate than large projects- there was a 20%
failure rate observed for small IT projects. (Figure 1) It is interesting that “poor
quality” was ranked 3rd highest as the reason for small IT project
failure with 17% of respondents, whereas it was the 2nd lowest in medium
(12%) and large (11%) IT projects. (Figure 2)
Medium:
A medium project was defined
as one with a budget of $350,000 to $1 million. Runaway budget costs are behind
one-quarter of project failures for projects with budgets greater than $350,000. There was a 25%
failure rate noted for medium sized IT projects which was slightly lower but
similar to the failure rate of large IT projects which stands at 28%. (Figure
1) In both cases, nearly one-third higher than the failure rate observed for
small IT projects. “Functionality issues” and “high cost variance” were both positioned
in the top 3 causes for project failure in medium and large sized IT projects.
(Figure 2)
Large:
A large project was defined
as one with a budget that exceeded $1 million. The failure rate of large IT
projects with budgets exceeding $1 million was found to be almost 50% higher
than for projects with budgets below $350,000. It is intriguing that as the projects
became greater in size, the failure rate increased accordingly. (Figure 1) Across
all project sizes, it was evident that “substantially late” was the main reason
for project failures, which is not a surprise considering the ongoing nature of
projects. (Figure 2)
![]() |
| FIGURE 1 |
![]() |
| FIGURE 2 |


No comments:
Post a Comment